Which Is Better For Video Editing Pc Or Mac Pro Have

Which Is Better For Video Editing Pc Or Mac Pro Have

The quick jab and powerful uppercut Apple threw at us with the MacBook Pro 16 and the Mac Pro have caught off guard a multitude of filmmakers, and many are now in awe trying to decide how to set up their desks.

Razer is well known as a gaming company, what is this Studio gimmick now, you may wonder.

It has a UHS-III slot (its not a typo Thats so new we still havent card on the market) and a wonderful 4K display, but most of all it has an amazing Nvidia Quadro 5000 inside.

Seeing the troubles weve had in the past with thermal throttling on these chips all across the board, it seems that Razer went a more conservative way.

The scheme repeats in Cinebench, but while the MacBook seems ready for takeoff, the Razer stands quiet and cool at around 75C.

The sheer size of the power brick should have made us guess the results.

The GPU alone can suck around 90W, and that goes beyond any battery in any laptop.

Not only that, but the MacBook can even be charged by a power bank, and that is a great option when you are on the go.

The GPU in the Razer leverages so much power that it wins almost always against the MacBook, even if not with such large gaps as we would expect.

Now its true that some of us do not need to edit always on a plane or train, but thats the reality for most of the creators that buy these laptops.

These are accelerating technologies that are used to speed up encodings.

But then again, once we unplug the laptop, the advantage is lost and were back on having Quicksync as a winner.

Even if things change as a result of AMD GPU innovation in recent Macs, we still need to wait for some software tuning.

The Razer is a great laptop, a wonderful machine for those that need a workstation they can move around a bit, but it suffers for such a drop in its performance when on the move that you need to consider this drawback seriously if youre going to purchase it.